Radiologically Defined Sarcopenia Affects Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, USA.

The Laryngoscope. 2021;(2):333-341
Full text from:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether radiologically defined sarcopenia at the C3 or L3 level as measured by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is prognostic of overall survival (OS) in head and neck cancers (HNCs). METHODS Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were conducted on July 12, 2019, to include articles written in the English language with no constraints on publication date. To be included in the analysis, articles had to report the prognostic impact of skeletal muscle mass measured radiologically at the C3 or L3 vertebral level in HNC patients; hazard ratios (HRs) for OS; 95% confidence intervals (CIs); be from a clinical trial, cohort, or case-control study; and have English full-text availability. Articles were reviewed in consensus by two reviewers, with disagreements reviewed by a third reviewer. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Checklist guidelines were used for reporting. Study quality assessment was performed using Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. The random-effects DerSimonian and Laird method was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Ten articles, nine retrospective and one prospective, were included in this meta-analysis (n = 2,181 patients). Significant differences were found in OS for HNC patients with sarcopenia (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.64-2.39; Pā€‰<ā€‰.00001). No heterogeneity was detected in either the overall or subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS Radiologically defined sarcopenia is a negative predictor of OS in patients with HNC. Early detection of sarcopenia in cancer patients may help guide nutritional and adjuvant support to improve treatment outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA Laryngoscope, 131:333-341, 2021.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis

Metadata